They all were highly inspired with Indian culture, spiritualism, Hinduasim. Swami Vivekananda spoke of spiritual nationalism; Universal brotherhood, it was the same Swami who introduced the hindu religion at global stage, Mahatma Gandhi spoke of Rama Rajya for India and always says Hey ram, his last word was the same. Bankim Chandra wrote the Bande Maataram, the song, the slogan, the mantra and the soul of the Indian freedom movement for the freedom fighters. Sri Aurobindo spoke of Sanatana Dharma as the nationalism of India. He didn’t rank it as a philosophy. He brought it down to the level of emotional consciousness. For them philosophy was not removed from the ground reality. The nation was at the core of their philosophy.

This was the intellectual scene, this was the content. This is what powered the intellectual as well as the mass movement in India at that time.

And now, come to the position today or after the independence, first let us see the mentality of our first Prime Minister of India Jawaharlal Nehru was in jail for 7 years. He was a great intellectual, purely in the sense of his capacity to reason, understand, read, and expound a thought. He told Galbraith once, “I would be regarded as the last English Prime Minister of India.” See the intellectual capability of the man, the enormously competent mind.

Today’s intellectuals are highly influenced with western culture, languages, history etc. They projected India as an uncivilized country, as a full problems. They feel shame discuss about Indian development, they feel proud about the discussion of slum, gutter. They feel and projecting everything that drove the freedom movement - everything that constituted the soul of the freedom movement, whether it is the Ram rajya of Gandhiji or Sanaatana Dharma of Sri Aurobindo or the spiritual patriotism of Vivekananda or the soul stirring Vande Maataram song, came to be regarded not only as unsecular but as sectarian, communal and even as something harmful to the country. If any body discussed about the Indian culture, spiritualism, hinduisam they present to him as a fundamentalist.

If anybody thinks about the nation, have national thoughts, than according to these intellectuals that person is not faithful for the country. Such types of intellectuals are in free India. They are not in touch with the culture but they comments, they are not in touch with society but they comments, they don’t know that what is atmosphere outside of air conditioned room, but they always comment. They are making cartoon of god and goddess then they are civilized and if anybody opposed it then he is uncivilized. Great intellectuality!

Once Macaulay says who formed the Indian education system in British India that “We require an education system in India which will produce a class of interpreters, who will be Indian in colour and Englishmen in taste, opinions and morals.” Such types of intellectuals are the product of Macaulay’s factory.

These kinds of intellectuals are dividing the India, they are dividing our society, they want to demolish the Indian culture, and they are showing a negative image of our country. This type of thinking is full of poison and much harmful for the nation, much dangerous from swine flue, and can say that it is intellectual pollution. There is a law for air pollution, water pollution, and other pollutions but not for such type of pollution.

Can anybody stop such type of intellectual pollution?

Commission and Committee of Parliament on official language.-

(1) The President shall, at the expiration of five years from the commencement of this Constitution and thereafter at the expiration of ten years from such commencement, by order constitute a Commission which shall consist of a Chairman and such other members representing the different languages specified in the Eighth Schedule as the President may appoint, and the order shall define the procedure to be followed by the Commission.

(2) It shall be the duty of the Commission to make recommendations to the President as to-

(a) the progressive use of the Hindi language for the official purposes of the Union;

(b) restrictions on the use of the English language for all or any of purposes of the Union;

(e) any other matter referred to the Commission by the President as regards the official language of the Union and the language for communication between the Union and a State or between one State and another and their use.

(3) In making their recommendations under clause (2), the Commission shall have due regard to the industrial, cultural and scientific advancement of India, and the just claims and the interests of persons belonging to the non-Hindi speaking areas in regard to the public services.

(4) There shall be constituted a Committee consisting of thirty members, of whom twenty shall be members of the House of the People and ten shall be members of the Council of States to be elected respectively by the members of the House of the People and the members of the Council of States in accordance with the system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote.

(5) It shall be the duty of the Committee to examine the recommendations of the Commission constituted under clause (1) and to report to the President their opinion thereon.

(6) Notwithstanding anything in article 343, the President may, after consideration of the report referred to in clause (5), issue directions in accordance with the whole or any part of that report.

It is considerable that all the languages which are already introduced in the schedule eight what are there importance accept the speaking, in there own region. We have a commission or a constituted commitee for the progressive use of Official and the regional languages and restricted to the English language, than why the all languages are fighting for there existence alongwith Hindi infront of English?
Here I am given the detail of speaker of total twenty two languages and ther regions:-
Language Speakers (as of 2001, in million) Geographical distribution
Assamese/Axomiya
13 Assam

Bengali
83 West Bengal, Assam, Jharkhand, Tripura

Bodo
1.2 Assam

Dogri
0.1 Jammu and Kashmir

Gujarati
46 Gujarat, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu

Hindi
422 the “Hindi belt”, Northern India

Kannada
38 Karnataka, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Goa

Kashmiri
5.5 Jammu and Kashmir

Konkani
2.5 Goa, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Kerala
Maithili
12 Bihar

Malayalam
33 Kerala, Lakshadweep, Mahé, Puducherry

Manipuri (also Meitei or Meithei) 1.5 Manipur

Marathi
72 Maharashtra, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Goa

Nepali
2.5 Sikkim, West Bengal, Assam

Oriya
33 Orissa

Punjabi
29 Punjab, Chandigarh, Delhi, Haryana

Sanskrit
0.05 Mattur

Santali
6.5 Santal tribals of the Chota Nagpur Plateau (comprising the states of Bihar, Chattisgarh, Jharkhand, Orissa)

Sindhi
2.5 Gujarat, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh

Tamil
61 Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Pondicherry, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Maharashtra

Telugu
74 Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Orissa

Urdu
52 Jammu and Kashmir, Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh

There is lot of users of regional languages alongwith Hindi, Hindi is Official Language but not a single work is being in Hindi.
Let us consider:

According to article 345, legislature of the states and law will be provide in English Language not in Hindi and other regional language which is given in schedule eight.

We cant take justice from court in our language because according to article 348 that all proceedings of supereme court, High court will be in English, so that millions of people cant understand the decision of honorable courts, than what is the necessity of Official language Hindi and other regional languages which is given in schedule eight.

Language of working in parliament and other lagilature assembelies is English not the Hindi and other regional language which is given in schedule eight.

Now once again what is the importance of the Schedule Eight, only for printing the languages name on the currency?

English which is not in the schedule eight, only 2 to 3crore users out of 125 crore people is the queen of languages.

Than why government made such type of amendments in the constitution just for the VOTE?

After the independence India faced many communal riots, perhaps riots being every year. But not a single government can stop the riots. Every time political parties blame once another but can’t gave any solution to stop the riots. For the riots Secular parties blame to the communal parties and communal parties blame to the double policy of secular parties but every time only public burned in the fire of riots not the politician.

There is no religion, caste and ideology of a politician. But they always talk about the caste and religion, actually politicians are playing with public by these words, every time politicians won the game and public loses. Not only public loses but a nation lose there culture, identity and sovereignty. Yes these communal riots are the curse for the nation though our nation faced every year these communal riots. I have study these riots and here I giving some major riots in India:

YearCity/State CasualtiesInjuredC.M. / Party in Government
1947Calc/W Bengal5000 diedd 25000 Prafull Ghosh / Congress
1947Punjab 5000 diedd 3000 Gopichand Bhargav/ Cong.
1964W. Bengal 2000 diedd Prafull Sen / Congress
1967Ranchi 183 diedd Mahamaya Prasad/ Cong
1968Asam 82 diedd B.P. Chalina / Congress
1969Gujarat 512 diedd H. K. Desai / Congress
1970/Maharashtra 120 diedd V.P. Naik / Congress
1972Nonari / U.P. 76 diedd K. P. Tripathi / Congress
1977Varanasi / U.P. 5 diedd Ram Naresh / Janata Party
1978Sambhal / U.P. 25 diedd Ram Nresh Yadav / J.P.
1978Hydrabad/ A.P. 19 diedd J.V. Rav / Congress
1979Jamshedpur/Bihar120 diedd Karpoori Thakur / J.P.
1980Moradabad/ U.P.2000 diedd V.P. Singh / Congress I
1981Biharsharif/ Bihar 80 diedd J. Mishar / Congress I
1982Meerut / U.P. 12 diedd 30 Sripati Mishra / Cong. I
1982Baroda / Gujarat17 diedd 50 M.S. Solanki / Cong. I
1983Malur / Karnataka Ramkrishna Hedge/ J.P.
1983Malegaon/Maharashtra VasantRao Patil/ Cong. I
1983Hazaribagh/ Bihar ChandraShekher/ Cong I
1983Hydrabad / A.P. 45 diedd 150 N.T.Ramarao / TDP
1984/Maharashtra 146 diedd 611 VasantRao Patil/ Cong. I
1984Delhi 2733 diedd Cent. Govt. Congress I
1985Ahemdabad/ 300 diedd M.S. Solanki / CongressI
1986Ahemdabad/ 59 diedd 80 Amarsingh chodhary/Cong.
1987Meerut/ U.P.3000 diedd Bir Bahadur Singh/ Cong.
1989Indore 27 diedd Moti Lal vora / Congress
1989Kota/Rajasthan S. C. Mathur / Congress
1989Bhadrak/Orissa17 died J.B. Patnaik / Congress
1990Gujarat 265 died 775 ChimmanbhaiPatel/J.P.
1990Jaipur / Rajasthan72 died 644 B.S. shekhawat / J.P.
1990Uttar Pradesh94 died 69 Mulayam Singh /SJP
1990Delhi 100 died Central Government
1990Assam 37 died P.K. Mahantha/ AGP
1990Maharashtra Sharad Pawar / Congress
1990Bihar 996 died Jagannath Mishara/ Cong
1990Madhya Pradesh13 died 150 Sunderlal Patwa / BJP
1990Karnataka 60 died S. Bangarappa / Congress
1990Hydrabad/ A.P. 299 died 350 M.C. Reddy / Congress
1991Banaras / U.P. 50 died Kalyan Singh / BJP
1991Baroda / Gujarat66 died 170 ChimmanbhaiPatel/J.P.
1992Sitamarhi /Bihar44 died Laloo Prasad Yadav/JD
1992Surat / Gujarat200 died ChimmanbhaiPatel/J.P.
1992Bombay 1000 died Sudhakarrao naik/ NCP
1992Bhopal /M.P. 143 died Sunderlal Patwa / BJP
1995Madras/Tamilnadu 4 died Jayalalita / AIADMK
1995Karnataka 1 died 2 HD Devegoda / JD
1995Kerala 2 died AK Antony / Congress
1995Bihar 5 died Laloo yadav / RJD
1995Hydrabad / AP 2 died 100 Chandrababu Naidu/TDP
1998Ajmer/ Rajasthan 25 died B S Shekhawat/ JP
1998Moradabad / UP3 died 50 Kalyan Singh / BJP
1998Hydrabad / AP 4 died 16 Chandrababu Naidu/TDP
1998Munger / Bihar 3 died 39 Rabri Devi / RJD
1998Suratkul/Karnataka 12 died JH Patel / JP
1999Surat/Gujarat 7 died 27 Keshubhai Patel/ BJP
2001Nalanda/Bihar 8 died 6 Rabri Devi / RJD
2001Moradabad / UP6 died Rajnath singh / BJP
2001Maharashtra 2 died 30 Vilasrao Deshmukh/Cong.
2001Malegaon/ 16 died Vilasrao Deshmukh/Cong.
2002/Gujarat 2000died Narendra Modi / BJP
2002/Maharashtra 9 died 16 Sushil shinde / Congress
2003Kerala 9 died A.K Antony / Congress

I have this detail since 2003 but its enough for the study. (In this detail some small riots, riots on cast system and on due to reservation has not been taken, figures of casualties and injuries is as per government record or nearby actual figures.)

This study has shown that approx every year riots being in India. And there is no progress for stop the riots till today. It’s not a matter which government ruled in the state, Congress, Janata Party, BJP and any others, riots are taking place every now and then. Every time politicians, a part of media, and intellectual, discuss only for the Gujarat riots and Narendra Modi, they don’t argue for other riots.

Yes Narendra Modi was responsible for Gujarat riots but what about 1969 in Gujarat, 1980 in Moradabad (UP), 1984 in Delhi, 1987 in Meerut (UP), 1990 in Bihar, and Maharashtra Every time congress government was ruling in the state and the center also. But it’s not a matter riots are riots and at the time of secular government, there were secular riots, communal government – communal riots.

All governments are blaming to each other, only giving the reason of communal riots not giving the solution to stop this. After the death of Indira Gandhi, there being communal riots in Delhi, and a minister of a government has told that “JAB KOI BADA PED GIRTA HAI TAB DHARTI TO HILTI HI HAI”. Such type of statements has shown the irresponsibility of the politicians.

Public acted foolishly and due to illiteracy and unemployment, they can’t understand strategy of politicians. Try to stop these riots and stop this dirty politics - secular, communal or otherwise. Do not divide the country.

Nationalism, Some times I think about the word Nationalism and secularism. What is necessary for a nation, Nationalism or Secularism?

A man who is devotee for his nation by physically, monetary and mentally, he thought that nation is first and other things are nothing in front of nation, he always thinks what is the best for the nation. This act should be the nationalism. In its simplest sense, nationalism is the devotion to the interests or culture of a particular nation. Nationalism represents an ideology and movement on behalf of the nation and incorporates both political and cultural dimensions. Actually nationalism is the common bond which holds the people of a nation together.

And what is secularism? Secularism means “Sarva Dharma Samabhav” (all religions are equal). It’s a beautiful phrase. Secularism is normally defined as something that has nothing to do with religion. Secularism as a modern political and constitutional principle involves two basic propositions.

The first is that people belonging to different faiths and sections of society are equal before the law, the Constitution and government policy.

The second requirement is that there can be no mixing up of religion and politics. It follows therefore that there can be no discrimination against anyone on the basis of religion or faith nor is there room for the hegemony of one religion or majority religious sentiments and aspirations.

In the case of India, India is a secular country but the Indian definition is that of mainstream political parties, a significant section of the media as well as a small but influential section of educated or intellectual people has changed over the years to mean anything that is anti Hinduism.

Now a question arises that what is the best for a nation, Secularism or Nationalism. Can a national thought always be a secular thought? Can Secularism and Nationalism go together in India?

Whenever we thought about secularism then always come in our mind religion but when we thought about nationalism than only nation comes in our mind not the religion.

Secularism is a dream word but it’s divided to the society in to two or more than two parts. But Nationalism always bound to the people for the nation.

It may be possible a country can not be survive by the secular thought, but by the national thoughts country must make progress, such as Japan, China, America and other developed countries.

If we read the preamble of our Indian constitution, that we will find that initially the word SECULAR was not in the preamble. The original drafting used the words “SOVEREIGN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC”. The two additional words “SOCIALIST” and SECULAR were introduced by the controversial 42nd amendment. The amendment was pushed through by Indira Gandhi in 1976, when she had dictatorial powers. For the Consideration, I am giving the preamble of the Indian Constitution.

WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens:
JUSTICE, social, economic and political;
LIBERTY of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship;
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;
and to promote among them all
FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation.

It has also proved that there is no need of secularism and it has not fulfilled the thoughts of a strong nation. For Example a strong nation always need a Common Civil Code for the people and our Constitution has also provision in article 44.

As per article 44, Uniform civil code for the citizens. The State shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.

But for the secularism our politicians always opposed it, and we are waiting for the implementation of article 44 of the constitution. Now the Question arises, What is necessary for a Healthy nation Nationalism or Secularism or Both?

From last three days I am on bad, due to fever. So, I was just reading a book for time pass. This book was related to Nathuram Godse. Yes the killer of Mahatma Gandhi. I read so many books on the Mahatma along with autobiography. And I also agreed for there title “Mahatma” and “Father of Nation”.

I think Simplicity was the symbol of Gandhi and he want to spread it everywhere, simplicity, self employment, peace, to used country made items and non violence is the given by Mahatma Gandhi. And for there principles no doubt that he was the Mahatma. But when I consider about political career of Gandhi than I feel that he has no vision what he want. Gandhiji Started Non cooperation movement but no result comes out, Round Table conference, no results comes out, In the Bhagat Singh Case, Gandhiji can’t do anything, Quiet India Movement once again Gandhiji can’t handle the actual condition, in Jinnah’s Matter he was again failed. His inner-voice, spiritual power and doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless. And most important in the matter of partition he can’t do any thing. Yes I like Gandhi very much, but when I read about the Nathuram Godse, and his idealism, I can’t take decision that he was fanatic or nationalist, he was correct or not but for consideration here I am giving Nathuram’s speech in the court:-

Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession.

I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other.I have read the speeches and writings of Dadabhai Nairoji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England, France, America and’ Russia. Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.

All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well being of all India, one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.

Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence, which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day.

In fact, honour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.

In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical, as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever for the freedom they brought to them.

The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very well in South Africa to uphold the rights and well being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility, if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way.

Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and everything; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.

Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible. Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with, as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster.

Gandhi’s pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India. It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India, Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect; it is spoken, but not written.

It is a bastard tongue and crossbreed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma’s sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India. His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.

From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League member’s right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork.

The Congress, which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism, secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian Territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947. Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance.

This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’ and ‘peaceful transfer of power’. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called ‘freedom won by them with sacrifice’ – whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country – which we consider a deity of worship – my mind was filled with direful anger.

One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan, there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.

Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, spiritual power and doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless.

Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan. People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building. After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House.

I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots.

I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy, which was unfairly favorable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi. I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preaching and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims.

I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism leveled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.
-NATHURAM GODSE
(Sources: “Why Gandhi Assassinated” by Gopal Godse)
It has to be seemed that this appeasement of minorities was started by the Mahatma Gandhi and Congress follows this rule till today. This policy divide between Hindus and Muslims is widening with each day. The extremist elements in both the communities are adding fuel to the fire.

In the matter of Jammu & Kashmir, “Gandhiji again and again declared that Sheikh Abdullah should be entrusted the charge of the state and that the Maharaja of Kashmir should retire to Benares for no particular reason than that the Muslims formed the bulk of the Kashmiri population. This stands out in contrast with his attitude on Hyderabad where although the bulk of the population is Hindu, Gandhiji never called upon the Nizam to retire to Mecca. That’s why, today India is facing the problem of J& k state. Due to such type of policies India face defeat in 1962, against china, main cause of wars with Pakistan in 1965, 1971 then Kargil and now terrorism. Pakistan has become a thorn in flesh for India.

Yes, I also believe in non violence and Lord Krishna Has also said in Gita “Ahinsa Parma Dharma” but he also said that non violence against the perpetrator of brutality is not the non violence this is cowardness. Gandhiji was the great man but not great politician. Nathuram’s vision was correct at that time.

SEZ means Special Economic Zone is the one of the part of government’s policies in India. A special Economic zone is a geographical region that economic laws which are more liberal than the usual economic laws in the country. The basic motto behind this is to increase foreign investment, development of infrastructure, job opportunities and increase the income level of the people.

The SEZ was first established by the China for increase in investment and increase job opportunities and technical knowledge and bring about certain tax reforms.

SEZ was introduced on 1/4/2000 in India with a view to provide an internationally competitive and hassle free environment for exports and make the domestic enterprises and manufacturers globally competitive. The units set up under SEZ can be for manufacturing or rendering service. The policy provides setting up the SEZ in the public sector or private sector or by joint sector or even by the state government.

Advantages of Sez:

SEZ’s are good from the point of view of growth and development. It increases income level of citizens, encourages competition and lowers labor costs.

Attracts FDI and exchange earnings:

FDI spells long term capital that can help sustain solvency. Also FDI will ensure meaningful ownership, in times of adverse claims pay put, it is only through the FDI route that foreign stake holders will infuse capital to come over the adverse situation
The state id well informed about the latest technology and also relevant information regarding the trade that goes on all over the world and how the domestic producers can penetrate into several markets. And private business’s can position them in the world market and boost the standard of living of citizen’s.

SEZ’s also create a lot of job opportunities:

Also when SEZ’s become a success it increases the GDP, and acts as a good economic model for the policy makers to mimic.
But SEZ has so many disadvantages too.

First and main loss of SEZ is large scale acquisition of land takes place which results in displacement of farmers and alternate means of livelihood are not available for them. This issue is a major problem; it is tough to relocate them to other jobs. It has to be seemed that it could create socio-economic disparities as the SEZ would accommodate the high and mighty the poor people will be pushed towards poverty and unemployment.

Second is lack of cultivable land, if cultivable land should be short than growth of agriculture should be reduced. That’s why the prices of food grains should be more up and inflation rate will be at top.

Third in the area of employment the disadvantage of SEZ is quite similar to the disadvantages of Wal-Mart entering retail business. New jobs are created and working conditions improve, but for whom…? It is for the educated masses and the literate people and not for the laborers. Laborers suffer in the form of; forced overtime, exhausting work schedules; poverty pay, and unhealthy working conditions. The majority of workers in the SEZ units are women who are exposed to the most humiliating sexual harassment s. Free trade creates a “race to the bottom”, whereby developing countries lower their labor charges and environmental standards in an effort to attract foreign investment.

Fourth, Companies would like to simply relocate to SEZ to take advantage of the tax concession’s being offered. This will bring about a significant revenue loss to the government. The companies that incorporate under SEZ enjoy a lot of tax holidays, this will result in a kind of ‘disguised industry’ just as ‘disguised unemployment’.

The Finance Ministry has estimated that SEZs could run up a revenue loss of Rs 1, 75,000 crore in direct taxes, custom and excise duties over the next five years.

At in the last, question is that what is the importance and necessity of SEZ in India? Is SEZ compulsory on the cost of thousand acres cultivable land, and the livelihood of farmers? Due to this sage government bare the lot of revenues losses, Farmers are fighting with the government and government surrendered in front of industrialist. Why is SEZ important?

I was in this impression that India is the poor country and our economy is week before this F.M. Statement. Well let’s go! We became also rich! Now enjoy the life. If flour is Rs.15/- per kg and grains approx Rs.40 to 60/- per kg, Milk is Rs.24/- per liter than what, no problem we can purchase because we are rich. If peoples dieing hungry its means that they don’t want to purchase food grain, they want to die and doing this.

Terrorism is the main problem of India. Our country is facing this problem from more than 25 years, billions rupees has been spent on this issue, but our government afford this because we have lot of money and our economy is strong. America is poor country. He can’t spend extra money for this that’s why he can’t tolerate the terrorism. For example Terrorist attacked on the World Trade Centre, and America attacked on the Afghanistan, he can’t afford because American economy is poor and our economy is strong, we can afford.

Next is unemployment, India has a huge population which is unemployed because our economy can afford the unemployed population so this is not a problem there is no need of employment If peoples are crying for the employment its means they are selfish otherwise why the F.M. given such statement.

Every time farmers of the country have to be weeping, sometime they cry drought….. No rain….. Sometime they cry flood……. More rain……… and every time they want subsidy for the government, actually they don’t want to do the work. Our economy is strong so government already declares a relief of Rs.60000 crore.

Every year there being so many scam in our country, Share Scam, Stamp Paper scam, Boforce scam, and thousands crores rupees will have been destroyed, but there is no problem because finance minister says our economy is strong than we can afford the lot of scams every year.

Roads are the symbol of the development in any country. All the Roads and national highways are full of holes and nobody can travel easily, government has no money to repair the highways. But peoples have money for repair there vehicles, which are run on these type roads, if low mileage giving the vehicle on these roads no problem, people can afford, petrol price is hiking, no problem people can afford. Because F.M. says, our economy is strong, than we cant doubt our economy.

Government has no budget for the sports, and there are no proper facilities for the sports. Our players used their own money for the necessary facilities in sports and games. First time in Olympic History our players won the medal in Olympics. In this regard government policy is very clear, before medal no money after medal Money hi Money. Its means government has no problem of budget for sports (F.M. Declare) actually government wants to stop the wastage of money, so the policy is first medal than money.

I cant understand that if economy is strong than why peoples are dieing hungry, why peoples are poor, why unemployment is increasing, why the farmers are weeping why the students and youngsters are going to abroad, why the inflation rate is increasing, why we are depend on America and other European country, why the increasing the child labor is increasing. But our economy is strong because says….. !

This is the first situation and second is different from this that is Brain Drain.

Those people whose are highly educated, engineers, doctors, scientists, MBA and others, thinking is same and they also thought that there is nothing in India and they also don’t want to live in India. What is the reason of this problem? And why the people think so negative. This is negative thoughts or frustration.

I think this is both the frustration and the negative thoughts against the India and the reason is same with both type of people and that is the basic education.

Our education system is not given to us a complete education, not given to us complete human, social and national feelings; our history is not complete, that is highly effective with British period, history and stories. All the history is in darkness and full of suspense, there are so many controversies. For Example we read in our books that Alexander was conquered. He defeat to Porus, while in a Hollywood film shows that Porus conquer and Alexander defeated by Porus. I also read about this in a history book named BHARTIYA ITIHAAS KI BHAYANKER BHOOLEN written by Dr. P.N. Oak. We are reading at 150 years old education system which is not be advance time to time. That gives us only the materialistic, economic and selfish thoughts.

This education system started after the revolution of 1857, British was worried and they can’t understand that what was the reason of the revolution, and how it can be stopped to become next time, at that time Lord McCauley says “ reason of the revolution is the national thought in the public mind and if we British want to stop this type of revolution than we have to change the education system of India and have to remove the stories of national heroes, national thoughts and write the history, from the syllabus, give him the English language and British history in the syllabus and remove the national thought from the education, after some time you will find the another cast of British, they will be black British, they will speak in English, they will think in English, they will laugh in English, yes they will be Indian but will be faithful to British not for India” . After that all the libraries fired. History was rewrite. Religious books destroyed.

Lord McCauley was right at that time now today’s generation is the black British not the Indian, and now today this generation fulfills the McCauley’s dream.

India has glorious past, there being so many great person, leader, heroes in India, this list is so long, they gave there whole life to the nation, we always remember those leaders, heroes, great persons at national days 15th August, 2nd October and 26th January, forgotten the next day. Next year they did same nothing is change in life. Today we have no meaning of there work, there thoughts, ideas and dream. They fight for freedom we are enjoying, they build up the nation we are living, actually the people think that freedom is very cheap because they not fight for this and they got freedom in free value.

Reason of all this type of mentality in the people, is our education system. Our Basic education system is not developing the national thoughts, social, enthusiastic and familiar thought in our mind. We took education not for our mental, spiritual and social development, we took education for making the carrier for earning money, for going to abroad for the status in the society, there is no value for etiquette, no value for society no value for state and the country. This education system is making to us weak, frustrate, making to us coward. Peoples are so weak they can’t fight against the corrupt system, that’s why the educated and intellectual people leave to India. This system is also developing the selfishness in the people mind.

I asked a question from those people, who take birth here, took food from hare, education from here and giving there contribution to development for another country this is unfair with India and our country.

India is the 7th largest country in the world. Today India have one of the largest army, nuclear power, Strong economy, second largest population though our 30% population is living in below poverty line, facing the problem of unemployment, terrorism is everywhere, communal riots, somewhere is flood and somewhere is drought, undeveloped infrastructure, peoples are dyeing hungry, everywhere is corruption, and in sports, we cant qualify in hockey for Olympic and we are at 56th place at in Olympic Medal tally.

These all are happening because we don’t want to fight, against the corruption, terrorism, communal riots and other problems. I think we all have been surrendered against the corrupt system.

If we want to fight against these than we have to change our education system, we want that education system which will be in favor of India, not hindu, muslim, sikh, chritian etc.
We want to adopt that which will give to us a complete national thought and develop some national heros. Peoples don’t want to go out side of the country.

In the ancient India, politics was first choice of the educated person and youngsters, such as Mahatma Gandhi, Pt. Moti Lal Nehru, Moh. Ali Jinnah Jawahar Lal Nehru, Dr. Rajendra Prasad, and the entire leader was highly educated youngster and belong to high profile family too. But today’s youngsters think that politics is the worst carrier and it is not for educated person.

It’s a sheer hard luck of India that its educated populace doesn’t realize the importance of being in this field, but then they (we) aren’t completely to be blamed.

If today our country is facing some critical problems that one of the problem is “young educated honest and enthusiastic people is far from politics”.

Today we are not consider about it, because we Indians think first ourselves than religion after that society, nobody worried about the nation, worried about sixth pay commission, worried about upper income, worried about carrier Engineer, Doctor, MBA etc. worried about cricket team, worried about BREAD, CLOTH AND HOUSE.

Nobody worried about Indian army, nobody worried about science & technology, nobody worried about dirty politics and nobody worried about nation.

We always chat about the dirty politics in our country. But, if anybody efforts have to clean this? No, not at all,
All are busy in there own life. Country goes to hell. We want to do blame only not want to do anything.

That’s why India is facing the lack of educated, honest and enthusiastic politicians.

I appeal to young blood of India that joins the politics. And clean this dirtiness of the politics.