Kashmir is burning. Central Government plays a strong roll of silent spectator. Public is in the perplexing. No body knows what is going to be happening. Supporter of Amaranath Shrine Board is in the strong action against the state government. State Government is in under pressure of the some local communal political parties and leaders (we can say secular in the language of UPA government), and not taking any action in this matter.

Kashmir is burning due to religious matter. But what about Banglore, Ahemdabad, Jaipur, blasts? These all blasts done by the terrorist and it was a terrorist attack. But again Government plays a role of good audience. No action taken by the government against the terrorism, why?

In this regard central government says that there is no need of any other law for stop the terrorism just like POTA and any other local laws of states. (Some Laws passed by the state governments are pending for approval in the parliament) Present laws are enough for stop the terrorism. Its mean that there is no need of security for the ministers and other political leaders but for showing the people two constable is enough with laathi (cudgel).

Kashmir is burning reason is not a religious, Gujarat, West Bengal, Eastern States, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh are also burning but reason is not the terrorism and religion. Reason is the poor policies of the government.

In the actual mean government have no idea to protect from the terrorism and stop the communal violence. Our so called secular government has not a single secular idea in this matter.

Not only Kashmir is burning, in the actual mean all over India is burning. Reason is not the religions and terrorism and others the main reason SECULARISM. The word SECULARISM is explained by our so called secular political parties, every party has their own meaning.

What is secularism for the nation? What is religion for a nation? Only Nationalism is the religion for the nation. And only national thoughts can be secular, other than this, is worst.

Why government not allows single policy for the single nation. Why governments not apply the common civil code? Reason of this is a special satisfaction for a special community. It is called in Hindi TUSHTIKARAN. This Tushtikaran was started by the Indian National Congress, when they support a communal movement (KHILAFAT ANDOLAN). Mr. M.A. Jinnah opposed this action, yes most communal leader Mr. Jinnah opposed the action he was not in favor of khilafat movement, in his thoughts that Khilafat Andolan is not a national and political issue and not related to India. But for taking the support of Indian Muslims, Congress supports this movement. At that time Mr. Jinnah was a secular leader in actual mean. He says this Tushtikaran is harmful for the nation, why we make two policies for a single nation. He was right.

Slowly Congress boycott the Jinnah and Jinnah join the Muslim League. At that time, the most SECULAR Jinnah converted in to the most COMMUNAL Jinnah. After partition he says from the leader of Muslim League that “I win Pakistan for you.” Now after some time I will go in my country and will living Bombay.

Mr. Advani was right in Pakistan tour. Well this is not a matter; matter is the policy of government and in this matter Mr. Jinnah has already given an idea that make a single policy for single nation.

First is nation and national thought and nothing is except this. Only this thought can stop the terrorism and communal riots, corruption and other problems.